Random Information Links.
As always, please do your own research or follow people who do. The following links are merely a starting point for you to begin your search for truth. Please feel free to share with others. If you find some links are not working just know that the internet is scrubbing the truth from Google searches, Wikipedia and Youtube. I do go through links when I can and replace them with ones that work. Rumble and Bitchute have been pretty good so far.
THE PCR DECEPTION ⎮ Short Documentary About the Test Used for Covid-19
Direct from UK Lawyer Anna De Buiscuit
FDA document admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else. A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus. In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative. It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
From the document:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative. We are now at a crossroads worldwide. The time is upon us to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, and impact upon the futures of our children. Or if we are finally going to say no to tyrannical government policy.
You can download the document here: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
What is in the PCR Tests? Metal, Glass, Lithium, Ethylene Oxide, & Graphene Oxide Found in Masks & Swabs, As Well as a Parasite in COVID Injections
Delta Variant Stats EXPOSED: Most Covid Tests DO NOT Indicate Which Variant People Have?!
UPDATE!! 07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
COVID-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless. Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear – they are not fit for purpose.
WHO Finally Admits There is a Problem With The PCR Test
The Covid Test Swab That Took Down the World
Check out the cancer causing carcinogen they sterilize them with: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/ethylene-oxide
NY TIMES: Up to 90% Who’ve Tested COVID-Positive Wrongly Diagnosed! TRUTH: A Whole Lot Worse! The FDA and CDC have spent months hyping a test that involves amplifying tiny samples of viral remains until there’s enough to detect. But, according to the New York Times, there are no rules or even any guidelines for how much amplification the testing companies do. Since any test will have a false positive rate, mass testing will mean that an alarming number of bogus COVID-19 cases will continue to be reported every single day from now til eternity even after the virus has run its course, creating an illusory pandemic that never goes away.
Before His Death, PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis Blew the “BIG SHAM” Wide Open on the faulty test kits!
The World Health Organization (WHO) has finally admitted in a memo from December 14/2020, that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests for Sars-Cov-2 will result in false positives. The question is: Why only now?
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
Crimes Against Humanity, fraudulent PCR Tests Taken To Court – Interview with Lawyer Reiner Füllmich
Breaking: Nanoparticles For Nasal Vaccination The Covid Test Is The Vaccination!
Watch the Video in the following article – crazy!
Medical Doctors Speaking Out Against Covid, Lockdowns, Masks, Vaccines and More:
Who knows what’s going on with this nasal tests. Mike Adams from NaturalNews.com said that he was going to do some tests on them, he has a high tech lab.
Never liked those nasal swabs. Why suck an intrusive test? Why not do a simple cheek swab?
NYT REVIEW: 90% OF POSITIVE CASES BARELY HAD ANY VIRUS
As daily reports of Covid-19 exploding in the U.S. continue, a New York Times review highlights the erroneous identification of positive cases that may be causing false alarm.
Due to unregulated PCR testing by the FDA, Covid-19 particles can be multiplied by as much as 100x – 1,000x more than are actually present in the body, triggering a positive result. According to the NYT review of 3 states, this over amplification of numbers has resulted in 90% of positive cases being identified as having insignificant numbers of particles, meaning that they are likely not contagious and needing isolation.
In Canada, PCR testing routinely follows this same protocol of increasing viral particle numbers. Applying the statistic from the NYT review of test data, could there actually be 10x fewer positives cases and deaths in Canada, resulting in only 13,024 confirmed cases and 914 deaths?
Highlights from NYT article, Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be:
“Tests authorized by the F.D.A. provide only a yes-no answer to infection, and will identify as positive patients with low amounts of virus in their bodies.
“The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive. The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus.
“Most of these people are not likely to be contagious.
“It’s the amount of virus that should dictate the infected patient’s next steps.
“The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.
“This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.
“In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
“On Thursday, [August 27, 2020], the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.
“One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.
“Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.
“Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.
“A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less. Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result — at least, one worth acting on.
“The Food and Drug Administration said in an emailed statement that it does not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that “commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own.”
““It’s just kind of mind-blowing to me that people are not recording the C.T. values from all these tests — that they’re just returning a positive or a negative,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.
““It would be useful information to know if somebody’s positive, whether they have a high viral load or a low viral load,” she added.
“Officials at the Wadsworth Center, New York’s state lab, have access to C.T. values from tests they have processed, and analyzed their numbers at The Times’s request. In July, the lab identified 794 positive tests, based on a threshold of 40 cycles.
“With a cutoff of 35, about half of those tests would no longer qualify as positive. About 70 percent would no longer be judged positive if the cycles were limited to 30.
“In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. “I would say that none of those people should be contact-traced, not one,” he said.
“Other experts informed of these numbers were stunned.
“I’m really shocked that it could be that high — the proportion of people with high C.T. value results,” said Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute. “Boy, does it really change the way we need to be thinking about testing.”
“But with 20 percent or more of people testing positive for the virus in some parts of the country, Dr. Mina and other researchers are questioning the use of PCR tests as a frontline diagnostic tool.”
U.S. statistics: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Canada statistics: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/canada/
COVID-19 Testing Too Sensitive: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/pcr-testing-contagious-new-york/2020/08/30/id/984566/
The majority of COVID-19 testing happening in the U.S. right now uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology. These tests detect disease by looking for traces of the virus’ genetic material on a sample most often collected via a nose or throat swab. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considers PCR tests the “gold standard” of COVID-19 testing, but, like all tests, they’re not perfect. Studies have suggested as many as 30% of COVID-19 PCR test results are inaccurate. (For comparison, the CDC in 2018 estimated that rapid flu tests have about the same rate of incorrect results.)
NY Times: Up To 90% Of People Who Test Positive For COVID-19 No Longer Contagious, ‘Don’t Need To Isolate’ – “We may have been testing the wrong way”
Before His Death, PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis Blew the “BIG SHAM” Wide Open!
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Everything We’ve Been Told about COVID is a HOAX
Check out all of my other posts at: